United States v. Redd
United States v. Redd
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7507
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DERRICK VINCENT REDD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00006-JCC-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 21, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Andrew Spencer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Derrick Vincent Redd appeals a district court order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We affirm. Because the amendment in question
did not lower Redd’s Guidelines sentence, we find the district
did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. United
States v. Goines,
357 F.3d 469, 478(4th Cir. 2004) (stating
standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished