Smith v. Michelin North America

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Michelin North America

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2025

JAMES E. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:09-cv-00022-JFA)

Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 25, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. William Lee Duda, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James E. Smith appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting

Michelin’s motion for summary judgment in this employment

discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Smith v. Michelin N. Am., Inc., No.

3:09-cv-00022-JFA (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished