United States v. Cureton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Cureton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7224

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LACARLOS DEMOND CURETON, a/k/a Loco,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (0:02-cr-01173-JFA-7)

Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 26, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lacarlos Demond Cureton, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lacarlos Demond Cureton appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed.

R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Cureton, No.

0:02-cr-01173-JFA-7 (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished