Smith v. Sharpe
Smith v. Sharpe
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7368
JOSEPH MATTHEW SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WENDY SHARPE, Nurse; JAMES KAY, Doctor; W.F. MCFADDEN, Doctor; R.L. NEVILLE, Doctor; JON OZMINT, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01482-TLW)
Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 27, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Matthew Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Janet Brooks Holmes, Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Bradford Cary Andrews, Samuel F.
Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Joseph Matthew Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Sharpe, No. 1:09-cv-01482-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.