Searcy v. Skinner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Searcy v. Skinner

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6286

EDGAR SEARCY, a/k/a Edgar Joe Searcy,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

NFN SKINNER; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; WARDEN FCI BENNETTSVILLE; WARDEN FCI ESTILL; UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, of US Department of Health; CARLOS BROWNLEE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:07-cv-03347-GRA)

Submitted: July 29, 2010 Decided: January 31, 2011

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edgar Searcy, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees; Carlos Brownlee, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edgar Searcy appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Searcy v. Skinner, No. 6:07-cv-03347-GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 3, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished