Vance v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Vance v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., 410 F. App'x 591 (4th Cir. 2011)
Agee, Davis, Per Curiam, Wynn

Vance v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adrienne S. Vance and Hollis Vance appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this negligence action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vance v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., No. 2:07-cv-00101-JPB-JSK (N.D. W.Va. June 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Adrienne S. VANCE; Hollis Vance, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished