Griffith v. Bird

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Griffith v. Bird

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8093

JOSEPH MICHAEL GRIFFITH,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

S. A. BIRD; BETTY BROWN,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

RICH JACKSON; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00308-GCM)

Submitted: January 12, 2011 Decided: February 8, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Michael Griffith, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Michael Griffith appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Griffith v. Bird, No. 3:06-cv-00308-GCM (W.D.N.C.

Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished