U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Seay v. O'Brien

Seay v. O'Brien
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 9, 2011

Seay v. O'Brien

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6435

BOBBY D. SEAY, Petitioner – Appellant, v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, USP Lee County, Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00361-jct-mfu)

Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: February 9, 2011

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby D. Seay, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bobby D. Seay, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Seay v. O’Brien, No. 7:09-cv-00361-jct- mfu (W.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.