U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Grasty v. Anderson

Grasty v. Anderson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 10, 2011

Grasty v. Anderson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1964

RAEBURN S. GRASTY, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ISAAC T. ANDERSON, Officer; CHRISTOPHER M. HAMILTON, Defendants – Appellants, and THE CITY OF ROANOKE; A.L. JOE GASKINS, Chief of Police; BARBARA P. CARTER, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00471-SGW-PMS)

Submitted: January 25, 2011 Decided: February 10, 2011

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Ross Spencer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellants. Raeburn S. Grasty, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Isaac T. Anderson and Christopher M. Hamilton appeal the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part summary judgment for the Appellants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grasty v. Anderson, No. 7:09-cv-00471-SGW-PMS (W.D. Va. Aug. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.