U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Countouroudas v. Vance Security USA Corporation

Countouroudas v. Vance Security USA Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 15, 2011

Countouroudas v. Vance Security USA Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1351

MARKELLA COUNTOUROUDAS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. VANCE SECURITY USA CORPORATION, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00548-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: February 15, 2011

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linda M. Correia, WEBSTER, FREDRICKSON, CORREIA & PUTH, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Tyler A. Brown, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Markella Countouroudas appeals the district court’s order granting Vance Security USA Corporation’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(c) motion for judgment on partial findings after a bench trial on Countouroudas’s pregnancy and gender discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and judgment. Countouroudas v. Vance Sec. USA Corp., No. 1:09-cv- 00548-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.