Vaughn v. Astrue
Vaughn v. Astrue
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1542
AMOS VAUGHN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. David W. Daniel, Magistrate Judge. (2:09-cv-00028-DAN)
Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: February 15, 2011
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amos Vaughn, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Mary Ellen Russell, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Amos Vaughn appeals the magistrate judge’s order
granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in this
action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits
and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Vaughn v. Astrue, No.
2:09-cv-00028-DAN (E.D.N.C. May 4, 2010). We deny the motion to
appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished