Vaughn v. Astrue

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Vaughn v. Astrue

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1542

AMOS VAUGHN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. David W. Daniel, Magistrate Judge. (2:09-cv-00028-DAN)

Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: February 15, 2011

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amos Vaughn, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Mary Ellen Russell, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Amos Vaughn appeals the magistrate judge’s order

granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in this

action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits

and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Vaughn v. Astrue, No.

2:09-cv-00028-DAN (E.D.N.C. May 4, 2010). We deny the motion to

appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished