U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Butts v. Donley

Butts v. Donley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 16, 2011

Butts v. Donley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2236

MICHAEL C. BUTTS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:08-cv-01963-AW)

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 16, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel K. Gebhardt, Charles W. Day, Jr., GEBHARDT & ASSOCIATES, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Melanie L. Glickson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael C. Butts appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his race and age discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2010), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f) motion for discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Butts v. Donley, No. 8:08-cv-01963-AW (D. Md. Aug.

28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.