United States v. Henderson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Henderson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7730

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DAVID HENDERSON, a/k/a Charldrick James Robinson,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:05-cr-00163-FL-1)

Submitted: February 7, 2011 Decided: February 16, 2011

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Henderson appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to correct a clerical error in the judgment

pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Henderson, No. 5:05-cr-00163-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished