U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Gibson

United States v. Gibson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 18, 2011

United States v. Gibson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7453

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. BERNARD GIBSON, SR., a/k/a Bernard Willis, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:94-cr-00454-PJM-2)

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Gibson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bernard Gibson, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Gibson, No. 8:94-cr-00454-PJM-2 (D. Md. Oct. 8, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.