United States v. Bowens
United States v. Bowens
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7679
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SPENCER BOWENS, a/k/a Scooter, a/k/a Clyde, a/k/a Melvin McCurdy, a/k/a Doc Johnson,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00110-REP-1)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Spencer Bowens, Appellant Pro Se. David Novak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Spencer Bowens appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bowens,
No. 3:98-cr-00110-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 12, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished