Galeas v. Neely
Galeas v. Neely
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7709
JORGE GALEAS, JR., a/k/a Jorge Gevara, Plaintiff - Appellant, and DELMAS M. BURCH; RYAN SHIPWASH; TRAVIS LOCKLEAR; ARTIS TAMAR PERKINS, Plaintiffs, v. RICHARD NEELY, Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00599-RJC)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jorge Galeas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Jorge Galeas, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Galeas v. Neely, No. 3:10-cv-00599-RJC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.