Mitchell v. Loven
Mitchell v. Loven
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2240
DANITA MITCHELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEAN P. LOVEN; LISA BELL, Judge; FELICIA MCADOO, Chief Deputy Sheriff; DANIEL BAILEY, Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00148-RJC-DSC)
Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: February 28, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danita Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Gerald Patrick Murphy, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Sean Francis Perrin, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Danita Mitchell appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing her civil rights complaint. On appeal, we confine
our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Mitchell’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,
Mitchell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished