Mitchell v. Loven

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Mitchell v. Loven

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2240

DANITA MITCHELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEAN P. LOVEN; LISA BELL, Judge; FELICIA MCADOO, Chief Deputy Sheriff; DANIEL BAILEY, Sheriff,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00148-RJC-DSC)

Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: February 28, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danita Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Gerald Patrick Murphy, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Sean Francis Perrin, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Danita Mitchell appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing her civil rights complaint. On appeal, we confine

our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See

4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Mitchell’s informal brief does not

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,

Mitchell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished