United States v. Prentice
United States v. Prentice
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7061
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:01-cr-00031-JAB-1)
Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: March 2, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Binkley, Assistant Attorney General, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Steven Dixon Prentice appeals the district court’s order substituting the North Carolina Fund for Medical Assistance (Medicaid) for the Orange County Department of Social Services as the payee of restitution ordered in this case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Prentice, No. 1:01-cr-00031-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.