United States v. Burton
United States v. Burton
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7241
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TRAYONE MAURICE BURTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:07-cr-00773-JFA-1)
Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: March 2, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Trayone Maurice Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley Duane Ragsdale, John David Rowell, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Trayone Burton appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his
request for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Burton, No. 3:07-cr-00773-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2010). We deny
Burton’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished