United States v. Burton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Burton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7241

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRAYONE MAURICE BURTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:07-cr-00773-JFA-1)

Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: March 2, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Trayone Maurice Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley Duane Ragsdale, John David Rowell, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Trayone Burton appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his

request for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Burton, No. 3:07-cr-00773-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2010). We deny

Burton’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished