U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Carroll v. Reese

Carroll v. Reese
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 2, 2011

Carroll v. Reese

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7245

ERNEST LEE CARROLL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEVIN REESE; ARTHUR L. THOMAS; GERALDINE STEEDLEY; THOMAS DOBSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (9:09-cv-00199-PMD)

Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: March 2, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Lee Carroll, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, MBR LAW, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Ernest Lee Carroll appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carroll v. Reese, No. 9:09-cv-00199-PMD (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.