U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Terrell

United States v. Terrell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 3, 2011

United States v. Terrell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7608

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. BROOKS JAMES TERRELL, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:99-cr-00610-HMH-1)

Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: March 3, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brooks James Terrell, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Brooks James Terrell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Terrell, No. 7:99-cr- 00610-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.