Floyd v. IRS

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Floyd v. IRS

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1881

BILLY D. FLOYD,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00066-FDW-DSC)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 4, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy D. Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Anne E. Blaess, Robert William Metzler, John A. Nolet, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Billy D. Floyd appeals from the district court’s order

dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his mandamus petition in

which he sought to enjoin the United States from seizing his

property to collect on a tax liability he disputes. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Floyd v. Comm’r. Internal Rev. Serv., No. 3:10-cv-00066-FDW-DSC

(W.D.N.C. July 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished