U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Burney

United States v. Burney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 7, 2011

United States v. Burney

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6709

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAYDON KURTIS BURNEY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cr-00402-REP-1)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 7, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Saydon Kurtis Burney, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Saydon Kurtis Burney appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burney, No. 3:05-cr- 00402-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.