Doyle v. Rite Aid Corporation
Doyle v. Rite Aid Corporation
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1251
NANCY L. DOYLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01106-RDB)
Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: March 8, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mindy G. Farber, FARBER LEGAL, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellant. James A. Rothschild, ANDERSON COE & KING, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Nancy L. Doyle appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Rite Aid Corporation in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doyle v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:08-cv-01106-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.