Ham v. Chandler

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ham v. Chandler

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7614

ANGELO HAM,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

NORA CHANDLER, Deputy Clerk of Court; LARRY PROPES, Clerk of Court,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (6:10-cv-02020-JMC)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo Ham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Angelo Ham appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Ham v. Chandler, No. 6:10-cv-02020-JMC (D.S.C.

Nov. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished