U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Ham v. Chandler

Ham v. Chandler
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 9, 2011

Ham v. Chandler

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7614

ANGELO HAM, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NORA CHANDLER, Deputy Clerk of Court; LARRY PROPES, Clerk of Court, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (6:10-cv-02020-JMC)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo Ham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Angelo Ham appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ham v. Chandler, No. 6:10-cv-02020-JMC (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.