Williams v. Mathena
Williams v. Mathena
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7686
DAVID W. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
R. C. MATHENA, Warden; J. KISER, Assistant Warden; MR. BAKER, Psychologist; D. VASS, ICA Classification Director; CENTRAL CLASSIFICATION, Name Unknown; JOHN GARMIN, Regional Director; MR. FORMER, Counselor; ROD WICKER, Chaplain; MAJOR NEWBERRY, Security; CAPTAIN GAYHEART, Security; LIEUTENANT HONAKER, Security; SERGEANT RATLIFF; SERGEANT WHITE; REYNOLDS, C/O; J. VASS, Programs; MILLER, C/O,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cv-00404-jlk-mfu)
Submitted: January 25, 2011 Decided: March 10, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David W. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees Ratliff and Miller.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David W. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing some of his claims. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291(2006),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292(2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46(1949). The order Williams
seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished