Kim v. Potter
Kim v. Potter
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1737
EUN S. KIM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JACK POTTER, PMG/CEO, US Postal Service; WENDY MCELWAIN, Plant Manager; DAVE PRESTON, Supervisor, Distribution Operations Time & Attendance Collections System Office; CHI THAI; CARY WINDSOR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:09-cv-02973-DKC)
Submitted: January 26, 2011 Decided: March 11, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eun S. Kim, Appellant Pro Se. Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Eun S. Kim appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her employment discrimination action pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 12(b)(l). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Kim v. Potter, No. 8:09-cv-02973-DKC (D.
Md. June 2, 2010). We deny the motion for appointment of
counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished