United States v. Johnson
United States v. Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7763
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STACY TREMAINE JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:00-cr-00114-F-1)
Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stacy Tremaine Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May- Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Stacy Tremaine Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Johnson, No. 7:00-cr- 00114-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.