United States v. Williams
United States v. Williams
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7484
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DEMETRIUS MARCUS WILLIAMS, a/k/a Meat, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00193-REP-6)
Submitted: March 8, 2011 Decided: March 31, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demetrius Marcus Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Demetrius Marcus Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 2:95-cr-00193-REP-6 (E.D. Va. July 22, 2009). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We note that the district court lacked the authority to consider Williams’s motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.