U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Allen v. Perri

Allen v. Perri
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 31, 2011

Allen v. Perri

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1018

BETTY PORTER ALLEN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JAMES ANTHONY PERRI, M.D.; PIEDMONT EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES, PA, a dissolved North Carolina Corporation; CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, d/b/a Carolinas HealthCare System; CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER-UNIVERSITY, a facility of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00666-GCM)

Submitted: March 14, 2011 Decided: March 31, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Betty Porter Allen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Betty Porter Allen appeals the district court’s order granting leave to proceed without prepayment of fees and dismissing this action alleging medical malpractice and negligence for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Allen v. Perri, No. 3:10-cv-00666-GCM (W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2011).

We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.