U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire

Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 4, 2011

Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2208

ADRIAN MARION SMITH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BRIDGESTONE NORTH AMERICA TIRE OPERATIONS LLC; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; RICHARDSON PATRIC WESTBROOK & BRICKMAN LLC LAW FIRM; TERRY E. RICHARDSON, JR., Attorney; DONNIE HOWARD; EDWARD J. WESTBROOK, Attorney; MICHAEL J. BRICKMAN, Attorney; CHARLES W. PATRIC, JR., Attorney, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01757-MBS)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adrian Marion Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Adrian Marion Smith appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice and for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire Operations, LLC, No. 1:10-cv-01757-MBS (D.S.C. Oct. 14, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.