Chestnut v. SC Department of Corrections
Chestnut v. SC Department of Corrections
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7748
CRAIG LATWAIN CHESTNUT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Turbeville Correction Institution; CHARLES BROWN, SCDC Employee Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (3:10-cv-02050-RMG)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Craig Latwain Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Chestnut’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Chestnut v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:10-cv-02050-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.