U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Stanley

United States v. Stanley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 26, 2011

United States v. Stanley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7600

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JIMMIE DARION STANLEY, a/k/a Big Worm, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:06-cr-01001-TLW-1)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmie Darion Stanley, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jimmie Darion Stanley seeks to appeal the extent of the district court’s reduction of his sentence pursuant to the Government’s Rule 35(b) motion. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (2006) this court does not have “jurisdiction to review the extent of the district court’s downward departure.” United States v. Hill, 70 F.3d 321, 324 (4th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.