U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Joyner v. Ozmint

Joyner v. Ozmint
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 28, 2011

Joyner v. Ozmint

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7624

BENJAMIN ANTHONY JOYNER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JON OZMINT; WILLIE L. EAGLETON; ANNIE SELLERS; DENNIS R. PATTERSON, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-02524-DCN)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 28, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Anthony Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Walker Heinitsh Willcox, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Benjamin Anthony Joyner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Joyner v. Ozmint, No. 3:09-cv-02524-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2010; Sept. 23, 2010; Nov. 3, 2010). We deny Joyner’s motions to appoint counsel and for transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.