Joyner v. Ozmint
Joyner v. Ozmint
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7624
BENJAMIN ANTHONY JOYNER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JON OZMINT; WILLIE L. EAGLETON; ANNIE SELLERS; DENNIS R. PATTERSON, Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-02524-DCN)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 28, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Anthony Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Walker Heinitsh Willcox, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Benjamin Anthony Joyner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Joyner v. Ozmint, No. 3:09-cv-02524-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2010; Sept. 23, 2010; Nov. 3, 2010). We deny Joyner’s motions to appoint counsel and for transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.