U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Khan v. Holder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 29, 2011 · Gregory, Duncan, Keenan

431 F. App'x 236

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mazhar Khan, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2) (2010). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Khan (B.I.A. Oct. 15, 2010). * We *237 dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

We have limited our review to the Board's denial of Khan’s motion to reconsider. Although Khan raises issues in his informal brief pertaining to the Board’s December 10, 2009 decision, which upheld the immigration judge’s denial of Khan’s motion to reopen, we *237 lack jurisdiction over these claims as Khan did not file a timely petition for review of that decision. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 394, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.