Carr v. H.O.P.E. Community Service
Carr v. H.O.P.E. Community Service
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1353
INETHA M. CARR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. H.O.P.E. COMMUNITY SERVICE, INC., f/k/a Central Piedmont Action Council, Incorporated, f/k/a C-PAC, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00159-JRS)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 23, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Inetha Michelle Carr, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Inetha Michelle Carr appeals the district court’s order granting her motion to proceed in forma pauperis and summarily dismissing her complaint for failing to state a claim.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carr v. H.O.P.E. Community Serv., No. 3:11-cv-00159- JRS (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2011). We deny Carr’s motions for a formal hearing and for a transcript at Government’s expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.