U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Alston v. Winthrop University Police Department

Alston v. Winthrop University Police Department
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 24, 2011

Alston v. Winthrop University Police Department

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6101

KENDRICK V. ALSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WINTHROP UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; ROCK HILL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER DEWAYNE BUNCH; OFFICER JOHN RANIER; OFFICER MIKE SMOTHERS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (8:09-cv-01130-RMG)

Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kendrick V. Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Terry B. Millar, TERRY B.

MILLAR, LLC, Rock Hill, South Carolina; David Leon Morrison, MORRISON LAW FIRM, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Kendrick V. Alston appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and the court’s order denying discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Winthrop Univ. Police Dep’t, No. 8:09-cv-01130-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2010; Jan. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.