United States v. Hazel
United States v. Hazel
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6376
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BOBBY HAZEL, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-6377
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BOBBY HAZEL, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-6378
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BOBBY HAZEL, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-6379
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BOBBY HAZEL, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:93-cr-00062-JCC-1; 1:97-cv-00633-AVB)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby Hazel, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Bobby Hazel appeals district court orders denying his motion for appointment of counsel and for DNA testing under 18 U.S.C. § 3600 (2006), and denying his motions for clarification and for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Hazel, Nos. 1:93-cr-00062-JCC-1; 1:97-cv-00633-AVB (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2011; Feb. 2, 2011; Feb. 4, 2011; Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.