U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Hurst v. City of Salisbury, Maryland

Hurst v. City of Salisbury, Maryland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 31, 2011

Hurst v. City of Salisbury, Maryland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2274

JERRY A. HURST, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF SALISBURY, MARYLAND; CHIEF WEBSTER; CAPTAIN WILEY; OFFICER SMULLEN, in their individual and official capacities; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; MARSHALL MAJOR; MARTY A. HARBIN; JOHN D. MCGAVIN; MAXWELL HUDDLESTON WIEGARD; GUY M. HARBERT, III; DOES 1-50, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cv-02516-WDQ)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry A. Hurst, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jerry A. Hurst appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurst v. City of Salisbury, Md., No. 1:10-cv-02516-WDQ (D. Md. Oct. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.