U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Thomas v. Allgood

Thomas v. Allgood
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 1, 2011

Thomas v. Allgood

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6105

TITUS THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER ALLGOOD; OFFICER VINE; GEORGE GREGORY, Hearing Officer; CCMS WILLIS; OFFICER HAWKINS; OFFICER ROBE; OFFICER JEROME; SGT. SMITH; SGT. OLIVER; OFFICER K. BROWN; SGT. D.

ANDERSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:10-cv-03134-AW)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Titus Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Titus Thomas appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights complaint for failing to comply with the court’s earlier order requiring him to particularize and amend his complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Allgood, No. 8:10-cv-03134-AW (D. Md. Dec. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.