U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Enwonwu v. Branch Banking & Trust Company

Enwonwu v. Branch Banking & Trust Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 7, 2011

Enwonwu v. Branch Banking & Trust Company

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2329

LEOPOLD O. V. ENWONWU, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY; HOUSE OF RAEFORD FARMS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a House of Raeford Columbia Farms; ALLAN RISINGER; ERIC LILES, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00858-CMC)

Submitted: May 31, 2011 Decided: June 7, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leopold O. V. Enwonwu, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Gottlieb Peavy, ROBINSON, MCFADDEN & MOORE, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina; John S. Simmons, SIMMONS LAW FIRM, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Leopold O. V. Enwonwu appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Enwonwu v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., No. 3:10-cv-00858-CMC (D.S.C. Nov. 10, 2010). We deny the motion for summary reversal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.