U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Claudio Occhione v. J. Babbitt

Claudio Occhione v. J. Babbitt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 8, 2011

Claudio Occhione v. J. Babbitt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2125

CLAUDIO OCCHIONE,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

J. RANDOLPH BABBITT, Administrator, FAA,

Respondent – Appellee.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Transportation Safety Board. (SE-18719)

Submitted: May 27, 2011 Decided: June 8, 2011

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claudio Occhione, Appellant Pro Se. Amanda Kate Bruchs, Laura Jennings, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Washington, D.C.; Karen V. Yates, NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Claudio Occhione petitions for review of the National

Transportation Safety Board’s decision affirming the

administrative law judge’s order upholding the suspension of

Occhione’s pilot certificate. Our review of the record

convinces us that the Board’s decision is based on substantial

evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.

Occhione v. Babbitt, Nos. 2009-AIR-00026, 2009-GL-05-0030, SE-

18719 (NTSB Aug. 17, 2010). We grant Respondent’s motion to

strike Occhione’s addendum. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.