Claudio Occhione v. J. Babbitt
Claudio Occhione v. J. Babbitt
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2125
CLAUDIO OCCHIONE,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
J. RANDOLPH BABBITT, Administrator, FAA,
Respondent – Appellee.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Transportation Safety Board. (SE-18719)
Submitted: May 27, 2011 Decided: June 8, 2011
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claudio Occhione, Appellant Pro Se. Amanda Kate Bruchs, Laura Jennings, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Washington, D.C.; Karen V. Yates, NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Claudio Occhione petitions for review of the National
Transportation Safety Board’s decision affirming the
administrative law judge’s order upholding the suspension of
Occhione’s pilot certificate. Our review of the record
convinces us that the Board’s decision is based on substantial
evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
Occhione v. Babbitt, Nos. 2009-AIR-00026, 2009-GL-05-0030, SE-
18719 (NTSB Aug. 17, 2010). We grant Respondent’s motion to
strike Occhione’s addendum. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.