U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Darryl Williamson

United States v. Darryl Williamson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 20, 2011 · Niemeyer, Gregory, Hamilton
435 F. App'x 224

United States v. Darryl Williamson

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Eugene Williamson appeals the district court’s judgment denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williamson’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williamson, No. 1:97-cr00181-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.