U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Carlos Cannon v. Chief Longo

Carlos Cannon v. Chief Longo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 21, 2011

Carlos Cannon v. Chief Longo

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6330

CARLOS CANNON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CHIEF LONGO; SERGEANT BROWN; SERGEANT NOON; WALLACE, Cpl.; STEVENSON, Officer; SUPERINTENDENT, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-01089-JFM)

Submitted: June 16, 2011 Decided: June 21, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads, Jr., Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Carlos Cannon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Cannon’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Cannon v. Longo, No. 1:10-cv-01089-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 22, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.