U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Erma Matthews v. M.C. Dean, Incorporated

Erma Matthews v. M.C. Dean, Incorporated
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 23, 2011

Erma Matthews v. M.C. Dean, Incorporated

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1322

ERMA J. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. M.C. DEAN, INCORPORATED; MICHAEL DEAN, Defendants – Appellees, and M.C. DEAN, a/k/a Michael Dean, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00622-LMB-TRJ)

Submitted: November 5, 2010 Decided: June 23, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Erma J. Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Manesh Kumar Rath, Robert Austin Sheffield, KELLER & HECKMAN, Washington, D.C., for Appellee M.C. Dean, Incorporated.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Erma J. Matthews appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court at the summary judgment hearing. Matthews v. M.C. Dean, Inc., No. 1:09-cv-00622-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.