U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Astou Diop v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Astou Diop v. Eric Holder, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 30, 2011

Astou Diop v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1885

ASTOU DIOP, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: June 20, 2011 Decided: June 30, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carrie Crawford, CRAWFORD & ASSOCIATES, Laurel, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas B.

Fatouros, Senior Litigation Counsel, James A. Hurley, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Astou Diop, a native and citizen of Senegal, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen and reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Diop’s contentions and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Diop (B.I.A. July 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.