U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Launeil Sanders v. Peter Gilchrist

Launeil Sanders v. Peter Gilchrist
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 5, 2011

Launeil Sanders v. Peter Gilchrist

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1303

LAUNEIL SANDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PETER S. GILCHRIST, Mecklenburg County City Attorney; MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY FINANCIAL, LLC; DANIEL CLIFTON, Attorney; EDWARD L. BOOKER, Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cv-00068-MOC-DSC)

Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 5, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Launeil Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Launeil Sanders appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v. Gilchrist, No. 3:10-cv-00068-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.