U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Reginald Jeffries

United States v. Reginald Jeffries
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 6, 2011

United States v. Reginald Jeffries

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6157

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. REGINALD DEWAYNE JEFFRIES, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00056-MR-1; 1:10-cv-00205-MR)

Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 6, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Dewayne Jeffries, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Reginald Dewayne Jeffries seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to amend his 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion and motion to supplement his motion to amend as well as his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Jeffries seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.