U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Eugene Fischer v. United States

Eugene Fischer v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 6, 2011

Eugene Fischer v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6210

EUGENE A. FISCHER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03048-D)

Submitted: June 22, 2011 Decided: July 6, 2011

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene A. Fischer, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Bryan Royster, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Eugene A. Fischer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fischer v. United States, No. 5:09-ct-03048-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.